Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogyakarta Principles in Action


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Yogyakarta Principles in Action

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references WP:V verifies the general notability WP:GNG of this topic. Thus this topic may be unsuitable for a standalone article on English Wikipedia. AadaamS (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Despite there are few reference of other international organisations that refer the "Yogykarta Principles in Action", I believe that the multilingual translations of full text of the Yogyakarta Principles, which are not official language of United Nation, have notability. In addition to an examples of human rights defending. Therefore I believe that this topic is suitable for condition and standard of English Wikipedia. Also the name of this article may be changed into "Activist Guide to the Yogyakarta Principles" if more citations from relating human rights organisations could be find. I hope more kind, tolerant and productive help for me on the topics--LilyKitty (talk) 16:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The article cannot be changed into an activist guide as that would be a violation of Wikipedia guideline WP:NOTMANUAL. Activism is better suited for other sites such as Wikia. AadaamS (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand the guideline of Wikipedia, and will not ask to change the name of the article. Just the article needs more references by international human rights organisations.--LilyKitty (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * while writing by human rights organisations may be used as sources for content in the article, the notability of a subject can only be WP:V verified by WP:RS reliable sources. One requisite for a source to be RS is that it is secondary - an affiliated chartiy championing the same cause may not qualify as secondary if its part of the cause. If you have WP:RS to verify the notability, please add them to the article as you seem knowledgeable about this subject and is the best qualified to find the required sources. 22:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- This article fails to seriously differentiate itself from the Yogyakarta Principles page and discusses primarily the guide for activists of the principles. Furthermore, it only has one truly secondary source. The rest are YP primary sources. Nuke (talk) 16:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.