Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan: Adhyayam Ondru (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  23:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Yohan: Adhyayam Ondru
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is a shelved film Kailash29792 (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That is not inherently a reason to delete. Even shelved films could get notability for a variety of reasons (controversy perhaps). If there is another reason to indicate it as non notable then pelase cite that I will then change from weak support/keep Lihaas (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito ☸ Dutta 18:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your statements are true, but this film failed to even begin. All that came was a teaser poster. For more info, pls read here and here Kailash29792 (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Soft delete for now (IE: incubate or userfy) and possibly merge to director Gautham Menon and only then redirect this title to that one place where his plans for a future film may be spoken of in context to his career. Allow undeletion or recreation once we have confirmation of filming.  User:Lihaas's points were well made in that sources speaking about the planned film, directly and in detail, approach the requisite coverage of production of an unmade film as encouraged by WP:NFF to sjow a notability. But as the film has been temporarily put on hold, under WP:FFCLARIFY and WP:NYF the question becomes one of how to best handle sourcable information so as to best serve the reader's wish to know more. Even were this to eventually be cancelled, and per policy the best place to speak of it for now would be at Gautham Menon.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing seems to have come of it. WP:CRYSTAL appears to apply to the comments above about what may/may not happen. Caffeyw (talk) 09:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing has come of it yet, certainly, but it is "shelved" not cancelled... and plans received coverage in multiple independent sources. It is unsourcable guessing to suppose when speaking about the film plans of a very notable Indian film director, that "nothing" will ever happen... which is the same type of empty supposition that WP:CRYSTAL was set to address. What we do not have to "guess at" is that independent sources do share plans for a film that was put on temporary hold when actor Vijay dropped out. What is being forgotten is that same policy instructs "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced'". We CAN speak toward things which have not yet happened, and through that policy instruction we are able to include sourced information about a director's plans for future films... completed or not... even if the topic of a planned film does not yet merit it's own article. Usefied or incubated as information is included in the director's article, the project is served. A redirect of a sourcable term to the place to where policy instructs it may be spoken also serves the project and its readers. Point here being that. filming or not, we have a topic discussed in multiple sources. Since it is premature for an article, we discuss where and how to handle that information as discussed in multiple sources.  Schmidt,  Michael Q.'' 10:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Tamil:
 * Tamil:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.