Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yolanda Pecoraro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Yolanda Pecoraro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems "notable" only for the allegation in a number of tabloids that she is a Scientologist who was allegedly auditioned to be Tom Cruise's wife. Obviously such allegations are unverifiable, but if she has no notability beyond this, IMHO an inclusionist stance is not warranted here. Laval (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - One event, which IMHO is only worthy for a tabloid, does not guarantee notability, especially when the case is inherit, notability is not inherit. Eduemoni↑talk↓  13:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Have any of her film or television roles received any coverage? Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Given that news outlets have referred to her as a "little known" actress it's safe to assume that she is still at the bottom of the Hollywood ladder. There are literally no secondary/tertiary sources -- all we've got are a bunch of news articles from last year and a few more recently that she was auditioned for Cruise. It's all hearsay and given that we can't even mention any of this weird garbage on any BLP, this article has no legs. Also editors should take into account the fact that this person is receiving publicity only for the fact of being a Scientologist who may or may not have been auditioned for the role of Stepford wife  numéro trois, this article is going to get its fair share of edit war. And because none of the sources available are verifiable at all, based on either hearsay or the subject's own words. Considering yet another former Scientologist from Norway just alleged recently that she also was auditioned, we could break out the tinfoil and speculate that this is all a very big astroturfing campaign and publicity stunt.   Laval (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * My investigation found similar. Delete Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Delete without prejudice. This is a clear case of too soon. The current article should be deleted, but I anticipate reliable sources beginning to discuss her soon, at which point it should be recreated. Andrew327 13:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.