Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yollies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Yollies

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NEOLOGISM -- a term that gets zero relevant gnews hits (the uses of "Yollies" which appear in archives are not for this usage). All sources cited in article written by same pair of collaborators. Article writer appears to be a promo account for the think tank publishing these writers. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete this neologism which not treated in secondary sources. It is also likely that the article is an attempt to increase usage of the term. Cnilep (talk) 01:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Europe's missing yollies will probably get deleted as well so no need to redirect. &mdash; RHaworth 11:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.