Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/York Region Administrative Center Annex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

York Region Administrative Center Annex

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG, lacks in-depth independent coverage. This article is mostly sourced to (1) the architectural firm and (2) a YouTube video posted by the owner. The "awards" listed are not significant. Leed Gold is not an award, but a green building classification (there are at least 10k of these in the US alone). The second award is an "honorable mention" and the write-up on the third award is the award submission written by the architect. Searching finds little more. MB 23:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Canada. MB 23:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's analysis of the awards. You have a certification, an honorable mention, and then a press release. Not really anything that indicates lasting notability. I found this but that by itself isn't enough, IMO. Alyo  (chat·edits) 17:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.