Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshiki Kuramoto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 00:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Yoshiki Kuramoto

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Long-term unsourced BLP with little or no notability. The Wordsmith Communicate 21:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 03:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Clear pass of WP:PROF, with h-index of 26. The Kuramoto model is the starting point for a lot of work in complex systems, and the entire field has received a good deal of outside attention, for example, from Nature (article behind paywall, but I can provide a copy to any editor interested, and so can any other editor with university library access). Ray  Talk 04:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ray. Why has nominator nominated so many articles with identical rationale, i.e., "Long-term unsourced BLP with little or no notability."  Some of them are non notable, some are clearly not, but nominations are identical.  Here, the subject has a whole separate article on something they conceived of.--Milowent • talkblp-r  06:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep on evidence of Ray. I endorse the concerns about the behavior of this nominator expressed by Milowent. To be more specfic, I suggest that the nominator confine his undoubted zeal for deleting BLPs to the non-academic ones and leave the academic ones to people who are prepared to put in the work to do WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep per decent H-index. Nergaal (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.