Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're Not Alone (atb)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete as a blatant copyright infringement, created today, of a copyrighted web page ("Copyright © 2003. All Rights Reserved."). The only additions beyond the infringing text were an infobox and some lists, made by the same editor who infringed copyright. The question of whether the WP:MUSIC/SONG criteria are satisfied can be addressed in the future if someone decides to write an article that does not infringe copyright. Uncle G 19:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

You're Not Alone (atb)
Article on song isn't impartial and reads like a copy/paste from a press release. Concluding statements fail Verifiability. However, does #1 on a German club chart merit an article on Wikipedia? Fails: Notability (songs) in my opinion. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  15:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Looks like is mass creating articles for André Tanneberger singles. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  15:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep since this is a highly notable club song, such that it has placed on German charts. However if it can be confirmed that this is a copy paste from somewhere else then it would need to be deleted due to reasons of copyright and started from scratch.  Yamaguchi先生 17:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * " ... reads like a copy/paste from a press release." That's because it is one. Unfortunately, the addition of the infobox may make it ineligible for speedy delete, in which case my (and everyone's) vote should be delete. - Che Nuevara:  Join  the   Revolution 19:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Article has been blanked and tagged as copyvio. - Che Nuevara:  Join  the   Revolution 19:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm going to bed. Could you please follow up all the user's contributions? Thanks,  Netsnipe  (Talk)  19:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.