Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouMovie Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

YouMovie Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Awards voted on by "Italian users of Google and YouTube"? Seriously? Zero independent notice. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also question: does the Italian WP even have an article on this? Specs112   t   c  14:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment A case of premature article creation: as far as I can tell the awards are being held for the first time this year, and voting is still going on, with results due on June 30th. It may well receive publicity after that, but we can't be certain. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * So basically, WP:CRYSTAL. Specs112   t   c  15:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete While applicable policy does allow that something scheduled to happen and reciving coverage "might" be dicussed somewhere... the catch here is WP:RS... and a lack of actually reliable sources speaking toward this topic indicates it currently lacks verifiability AND notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * comment I'm italian! In Italy this awards has got a lot of success. I also heard on the radio, on UndiciRadio. I think that sources are reliable because they are used on italian wikipedia. There is also a reliable source from an italian website: It is from BASTARDI PER LA GLORIA. There is a page on italian wikipedia for this online magazine: here. Augusto Antonio (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But does that mean that it is worthy of an article on the English Wikipedia? I wouldn't say so. Specs112   t   c  12:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * His comment is a bit racist ... Augusto Antonio (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not being racist. I'm just saying that the presence of an article about it on another language wiki doesn't automatically grant notability on this one. Besides, the article for that magazine on the Italian Wikipedia isn't particularly good. And while I would very weakly support the article for that magazine itself, that article isn't even the issue here. The magazine may be debatably notable, but its as-yet nonexistent awards are definitely not. Specs112   t   c  18:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * To User:Augusto Antonio. Please keep in mind that what is required to show notability for an article on it.Wikipedia, or even an article existing on it, has litle bearing upon the requirements at en.Wikipedia. What we need HERE are multiple secondary sources speaking about the topic.  As these are more often available ater an event takes place, the thoughts are simply that the article is premature.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that we must wait until the end of the first edition and then we write a more detailed page with a dozen different sources. What do you think? Augusto Antonio (talk) 21:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That would work only if the thing gets decent coverage in reliable sources.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm Italian, passionate about cinema, I have actually subscribed a couple of film magazines, I regularly check cinema-related websites and blogs but never heard about this award. Maybe it is popular in some social networks or forums, but I can't say it is actually notable. Even my searches found anything significative. Maybe notable in the future, not now. Cavarrone (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think that this page must be saved because sources are very authoritative. Mr. Taddeo (talk) 19:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.