Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Are Not Stealing Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion besides the nominator but not enough comments to establish a consensus. No prejudice against a speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

You Are Not Stealing Records

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seemingly non-notable media/music related article on a record label. Speedy-deleted twice, now a AfD to finally establish consensus. SGGH ping! 10:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep unlike most record labels, this one actually appears to have some coverage in reliable sources and meets WP:CORP it could use some more references though.--RadioFan (talk) 10:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —TexasAndroid (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.