Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Call This Music?! Volume 2 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

You Call This Music?! Volume 2
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable compilation album that doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. The only review I could find is the OC Weekly one linked, no other reviews or WP:SIGCOV found. No clear redirect target as the record label was deleted for being non-notable. Last AfD (in 2006) closed as no consensus. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already visited AFD before so a Soft Deletion is not an option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music,  and California. StreetcarEnjoyer  (talk)  20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and lack of sources; arguments from the old AfD no longer hold up. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Lots of hits on the name, but none about this album. Not meeting notability requirements these days on wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: "It has lots of Google hits, so it must be notable" was basically the result of the last AfD, what fun times those were. Oaktree b (talk) 23:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Here's the linkrotted OC Weekly review. That's not gonna do it. So, can we merge to Volume 1? No article. That album got a 14-word review in the forgotten pages of Punk Planet 54 and an admittedly much better review in Razorcake #2. I can't link you that one because I'm 90% sure the host for the pdf I read is violating copyright. Trust me that it's a pretty good review, but the publication is a self-described fanzine and so—despite its history—lacks the editorial control to be a reliable source to establish notability. Well, let's just merge it to the record label, then. Guess not that, either. Lubal (talk) 00:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, as subject crashingly fails WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.