Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Ought to Listen to This


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ron_Kenoly. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG presented. Verifiable, however, so a redirect is fine. j⚛e deckertalk 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

You Ought to Listen to This

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable "custom album", ona search on Google, an album is found but by other singer. Also, it doesn't meet music notability and is comp. unsourced. Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 06:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK  IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 07:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable, no sources. DietFoodstamp (talk) 10:24, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment See Contemporary Black biography: Vol. 45, p. 121, Gale Research Inc, ISBN 9780787667337: "Kenoly began trying to break into the gospel music scene in the late 1970s but had very little success until he produced his own album You Ought to Listen to This in 1983." If we can't find out more then redirect to Ron_Kenoly. The existence of the album is verifiable and redirect is in my opinion better than deletion. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:57, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 03:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)




 * Redirect as per the above; it's the title of an album, and should redirect to the artist in the absence of a better target. The notability just isn't there so far as I can tell. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.