Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You could be happy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Eyes Open. –MuZemike 00:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

You could be happy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication why this song is particularly important. While claims are made that it is "widely used in media", there isn't a single source provided in the article. Google searches show the song (how couldn't it?) but where is the proof of notability, significance, or importance? I don't see any, so that's the AFD. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 14:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. No, you can't. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak redirect to Eyes Open ("weak" because of the improperly formatted title). That article mentions a few factoids about the song. Location (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Eyes Open. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Eyes Open. The song is mentioned within album and concert reviews (e.g., ), but the coverage for the song itself ranges from passing mentions to 1-2 sentences; nothing particularly significant enough to convince me it satisfies WP:NSONGS.  Gongshow  Talk 03:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think a redirect is necessary because if someone searches for the song title (in the future) they will probably end up at the album article anyway. Also, this article is mostly unsupported and unencyclopedic interpretation by a fan. If the song was really used in documentaries and an episode of Smallville, this can be mentioned at the album article or band article IF verified by reliable sources. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Location above noted the improperly formatted title. I fixed this with a Move just in case the article survives or gets redirected. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.