Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You infant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You infant

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Maybe this slang definition could go to Wikidictionary, but it doesn't belong in an Encyclopedia. MRoberts &lt;&gt; 23:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and don't transwiki to Wiktionary. --Dennisthe2 00:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Slang is not encyclopedic. I also object to a possible transwiki. This also should not be included in Wikionary. Soltak | Talk 00:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is neither slang, nor neologism, nor a dictionary article. It is no more than a juxtaposition of two words without notability, references or sources. Make it go away.--Anthony.bradbury 01:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but transwikification not needed.  Insane  phantom   (my Editor Review)  01:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Keeping this would set a horrible precedent, leadying to articles for You turdmonkey, You asshat etc... Caknuck 01:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree wholeheartedly with Caknuck. Do not transwiki, or in addition to the above entries we could see "You cranberry", "You salivary gland", "You secondhand car", and "You unsourced Wikipedia article".--N Shar 02:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete image all the slang articles, yeah transwiki might not be a bad idea. Arjun  02:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.