Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You shall not make for yourself an idol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion has been given.  DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You shall not make for yourself an idol

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Preaching bobrayner (talk) 04:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and trim. Per the navbox, other articles on exist on each commandment. Sources do exist to write a full article on each commandment; any issues are easily fixed. This is not my area of expertise, unfortunately, so that means it's somebody else's problem. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, since we are discussing the topic, rather than this particular article. Some of the other articles on the 10 commandments have been around for a while, and have survived merge discussions. There's so much that could be said about this commandment - we can't include it in the Ten Commandments article, which is already 75K, well beyond the guidelines of WP:SIZE. StAnselm (talk) 07:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. I've put rescue and cleanup tags on the article - the article is one-sided (badly so), and does not conform to WP:NPOV in my opinion, ergo the rescue; the cleanup is foregone from there.  Otherwise, a summary of interpretation is, in my opinion, not a Bad Thing. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 16:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Has more than 100 references. There is not even a reason given as to why this article is proposed for deletion; therefore, I do not know what to argue against. This may be grounds for a speedy keep per Speedy keep #1. Xyz7890 (talk) 23:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment- Much of this article seems to be redundant to Idolatry and Christianity and Idolatry in Judaism, and is not as neutral in tone. Possible merge? Reyk  YO!  08:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep nomination sounds like nothing more than WP:IDONTLIKEIT. TomCat4680 (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep This verse has received the attention of academics and theologians for centuries.  Them From  Space  23:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.