Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Communist League of Yugoslavia (1992)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to New Communist Party of Yugoslavia. Spartaz Humbug! 03:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Young Communist League of Yugoslavia (1992)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability, article provides no sources and offers miniscule information. Buttons (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.


 * Keep - This is just a stub, ergo no sources. A youth section of a Communist Party in a former Communist country is gonna get over the notability bar; not sure why this was challenged. Carrite (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * ? - A stub? Then I don't see the justification in having a seperate page for the youth section of an already miniscule party, I stand by my proposal for deletion, at the very least this page should be merged. Buttons (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ! - A stub is a placeholder for a potential future full length article. Although merger without prejudice against recreation would probably be effectively the same thing and I have no problem with that... Carrite (talk) 03:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge it with New Communist Party of Yugoslavia. Doorbellbuzzard (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with New Communist Party of Yugoslavia. Neither article is long enough to require splitting, and there is no indication that the youth section is especially notable independent of its parent party. --RL0919 (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.