Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Conservatives of California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 07:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Young Conservatives of California

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The founder of Young Conservatives of California created a page for his organization as well as one for himself, as far as I can tell no reliable source exist on this topic and they do not meet WP:NOTE not to mention blatant WP:COI violation Daniel J. Leivick 04:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also nominating the creators page.


 * Delete per nom. --Candy-Panda 04:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * STRONG Delete - per nom. Ugh, now there's political WikiCrap...  •The RSJ•    Talk  |  Sign Here  05:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly CoI and OR and lacking any independent reliable sources. I know Wikipedia is not a soapbox, but sometimes I can't bite my tongue hard enough . At least the second guy's wearing an appropriately coloured shirt. --  Islay Solomon  |  talk  05:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ORG. MER-C 05:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:ORG. Terence Ong 09:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:COI that fails WP:ORG.-- danntm T C 20:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, you know something's fishy when "Bstein80" is the primary author of Brendan Steinhauser. Krimpet 02:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.