Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Left

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The vote was inconclusive so the result of the debate was keep for all four articles. - AndyL 03:25, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Young Left

 * It appears that this never made it main VfD page... re-posting. Vote Delete as non-notable. Googling "young left"+toronto-jays (need to omit the young left-handers on the Toronto Blue Jays) gives approx 500 hits. Feco 23:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Young Left article seems worthy of deletion on notability grounds. I tried to encourage improvement but on re-reading it seems unlikely to be notable enough to justify it. I vote Delete Johnnyio 04:19, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It is most likely that this sock puppet troll Johnnyio is out for revenge, probably over the stuff in the Paul Robeson article with TDC. I think membership in the World Federation of Democratic Youth alone is significant enough for an entry. I vote Keep! --Mista-X 04:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Love out to Mista-X our brother from Canada, but I am not motivated by revenge I am just not at all certain a membership organization with no members is notable enough for an entry. If you are or were a member, perhaps there is more you can tell us about the organization to justify its article. I doubt membership of the World Federation of Democratic Youth is sufficient, and such membership would need to be established anyway. Good luck with it. Johnnyio 04:39, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * I never said I was from Canada and why does it matter? Why do you assume that YL has no members? The organization is smaller than it was a year ago, but it still exists. Some of the members are currently abroad, and some are holding posts in student unions. When I get the chance to add more information I will. I am 90% sure YL was a member of WFDY, and perhaps I can e-mail WFDY to confirm this. At any rate, YL is a historical reality, which may be more than you can say for yourself. --Mista-X 04:47, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 02:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete unless something can be changed, Axeattack 05:14, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep group is relatively well known in Toronto. AndyL 07:09, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I trust AndyL above. (Mista-X, you too but please avoid personal attacks.) Samaritan 15:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. CJCurrie 23:32, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Spinboy 00:15, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established. Indrian 04:08, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - SimonP 13:06, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, seems established well enough. Radiant_* 13:31, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ground Zero 14:19, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of Notability TDC 01:21, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete YL not notable, the article itself acknowledges that. Dagen 05:37, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep A significant Toronto left group which is recognized by the United Nations Ruy Lopez 05:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Recognized the United Nations? What are you talking about? Dagen 06:23, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. They're quite notable, actually. T IMBO  ( T A L K )  08:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I also must note that Johnnyio was blocked shortly after his posts here for sockpuppeting, POV pushing, vandalism etc. T IMBO  ( T A L K )  08:13, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.