Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Oak Kim Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Wine Guy  ~Talk  10:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Young Oak Kim Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod declined with addition of sources. Sources include two directory listings, a blog, and one non trivial news source. I don't know if that's enough to carry the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although middle schools do not get the same pro-notability presumption as do high schools, I think this school probably passes WP:GNG.  Has received press attention as the only middle school in the Los Angeles Unified School District (second largest district in the U.S.) practicing single-sex education.  Also, as a part of Arquitectonica's Wilshire Vermont Station project located on Wilshire Boulevard, one of L.A.'s most iconic streets, it is probably a building of architectural significance.  I added a Los Angeles Daily News article discussing the single-sex education experiment, as well as a Los Angeles Times article from 2007 about the architecture of the complex, and have started a reformat of the article per WP:MOS.  Will look for more cites.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have added another worthwhile source. Plenty of media coverage and enough to mark this one out from the general run of middle schools. TerriersFan (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Very few elementary/middle schools meet WP:GNG, but the article currently cites at least a couple of significant and reliable sources and therefore I think it is notable. PDCook (talk) 03:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.