Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Spiffy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Young Spiffy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

as per my previous nomination. fails WP:MUSICBIO. no evidence of actually producing albums, winning major awards. in fact according to the article started his own label LibStar (talk) 02:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 02:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, borderline A7. Fails WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Full of "citation needed" tags, some of which are the only claim to notability anyway, and the fact that this record label has apparently only signed family up shows how notable it isn't. And this guy fails everything that the nom says it does. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 07:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.