Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young and Free International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, unfortunately notability per WP:N has not been demonstrated.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Young and Free International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. I wasn't able to find any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 03:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

But what about this article is really wrong? Why can't someone just point out the exact "lines" that are not good so that some adjustments are made? Please I seek all your guidance.Reliable sources such as Campus Bee Uganda do exist. First of all, it is verifiable that the company in question does exist, then it is verifiable that the event talked about does exist and existed. If someone is saying it has been written as an advert, why cant the particular line be singled out so adjustments are made? I do highly believe Wikipedia is there to give true information that exists to the readers. So, if something is true but not known to some users who propose deletion, does that mean it does not exist? If it has been written like an advert, why cant someone point out the unnecessary lines so adjustments are made? Lots of new things come up and we welcome them so we keep infromation flowing. All we got to do is to keep updating it. Young and Free International needs to stay on the encyclopedia because much as it is not known by some users on this platform, in a certain country else where, youth are acknowledging and appreciating it and the world needs to know that. So, please, i humbly ask that we consider making adjustments to this article than deleting it. It will be so unfair if we delete this article just because of a person trying to relate issues seemingly connected to their point of view and attaching them to the guidelines of wikipedia yet it may not be the case. I seek your guidance please. Belguinprosper (talk) 03:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 03:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Belguinprosper: The issue isn't that it sounds like an advertisement (that is a problem, but like you said, it can be fixed). The issue is that the subject of the article doesn't meet the standards of WP:ORG, and no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. I appreciate that you are trying to get information out about the organization that you started, but Wikipedia isn't really the place for that. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * Ahecht I appreciate your response and guidance and am willing to follow your advice please. However, to be open and sincere, my information is not biased at all. Please, I kindly request you to please help me out in making this information as neutral as you seem fit. I welcome your help please. Then about notability and nuetrality, I was and I am still adding more info to the article please whether positive or negative because I know its not the last time this article is being updated. Please help me where u find necessary. I WELCOME YOU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belguinprosper (talk • contribs) 04:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * G11 Speedy Delete, and so tagged. Naked spam article, apparently created by the company's alleged CEO. Pax 09:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I had PRODded the article with the same reason given here by Ahecht. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.