Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young vampires chronicles of the hunters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Young vampires chronicles of the hunters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable novel. A search failed to find any reliable coverage, and mostly Amazon links. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find anything to show that this book is ultimately notable. It looks like this is the author creating his own page, so I've pointed him towards our WP:COI policy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete spammy nn Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear COI. Non-notable. No significant independent coverage. Created for promotion by the author. Cowlibob (talk) 13:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious WP:COI. Fails WP:NBOOK. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree that this looks like a promotional conflict of interest.  Can be recreated later if it gets any professional reviews.  Until then, it's not notable enough for an article.  I don't see any evidence at all of critical attention. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.