Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Cheatin' Heart (Phil of the Future episode)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. --Luigi30 (Ta&lambda;k) 14:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Your Cheatin' Heart (Phil of the Future episode)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a Phil of the Future episode that is a 1-2sentance summary (taken from List of Phil of the Future episodes) and an infobox. Provides no more information than the list of episodes does Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages per above:


 * Keep - I fixed it up. - Peregrine Fisher 20:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You fixed up the one page but what about the other 2? as well as the rest of the episodes which are still the 1-2 sentence from the list?? --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I can go either way on the other two. These Disney Channel episode pages attract a lot of editing, and will be cleaned up pretty soon.  Deleting them now and recreating them later is fine with me, too. - Peregrine Fisher 20:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * They should either be deleted and recreated when they have enough info to qualify for an article, or be moved into user space until they have info info for an article. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete All - speculative, unreferenced, and generally inappropriate. /Blaxthos 21:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - television episode articles are perfectly acceptable, it's from a notable show so that surely helps, it still being a stub is not criteria for deletion. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You miss understand me i think. Its not even a stub. Its the same 1-2 sentence that is on the list of episodes. It provides no more info than the list does. If they are all changed and made into articles that provide more info I wouldn't mind keeping them --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Then expand it! I'd certainly do it if I watched this series, or was interested in Disney - frankly I'm sick of moaning, if people are unwilling to meat out the articles that aren't up to spec then just don't look at them, simple as that - but deletion is not the answer - temporary redirection might be however. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If i had seen all the episodes more than once I would do it myself. But, since they aren't aired as much as the rest of disney channels newer shows, I dont remember what happened in every episode. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, so the correct course of action would be to place Expand on the page, if no one works on it in say two weeks then redirect it to the LOE, hopefully/eventually someone will do it, I can certainly say I wouldn't work on the page if it was deleted. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - enough length, and followed by a list of episode articles. AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx) 00:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * My (GunnarRene 01:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)) call:
 * Keep
 * Weak keep : At least it has some credits not in the list.
 * Weak keep : At least it has some credits not in the list.
 * Keep - it is adequate already.  Insane  phantom   (my Editor Review)  05:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It's plot and nothing else and has no major significance outside the show itself. This level of plot summary is hardly required for other articles regarding this show. See WP:FICT, WP:EPISODE, and WP:NOT (number 7). -- Ned Scott 08:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep It's been fixed up.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  01:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Even if barebones, easier for casual editors to supply detail if something is there (IMHO) - Butseriouslyfolks 15:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.