Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Demise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nomination Withdrawn (non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 00:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your Demise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another fail for WP:BAND, imho, albums released on insignificant indie label, can't see much reliable, independent coverage (ok so there's a gig review or album review here or there, all seem to be posted by online contributors, not editorial staff, i.e. fans).  Captain Screebo Parley! 15:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination per numerous sources found by editors below, although I agree with Colapeninsula that a lot of what x/he lists are not very in-depth, I would say that as a whole, the sheer number go to establish notability.  Captain Screebo Parley! 20:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There is a good amount of online coverage, though much of it is not very in depth. But i think together it meets WP:GNG. Coverage in well-established UK metal magazines AllMusic profile. Punknews.com Articles on other websites. There's a shortage of reviews but I did find: AllMusic, Bring The Noise, Sputnik have a "contributor" review. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * (ec)Keep. Allmusic has a biography and a review of one of their albums (which saw a US release on Earache Records). There's also a review from Rock Sound, among others (e.g., though some of these may or may not be classed as reliable). Article needs sources, but meets WP:BAND. — sparklism hey! 10:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough coverage to be considered notable via that route. --Michig (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.