Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youssouf Diallo (Ivorian footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Youssouf Diallo (Ivorian footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG and the spirit of NFOOTBALL, his professional play being limited to 1 game. Career was over in 2010. The article "Youssouf Diallo, le diamant brut" is nowhere near enough for GNG, Wikipedia is not a repository of every person who has ever been interviewed by a newspaper. Geschichte (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:GNG by way of FOOTY having played in a fully-professional competition. --Jimbo[online] 15:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Someone can't pass GNG via other guidelines, only through sources. Geschichte (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: Subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG and as such doesn't warrant a standalone article. Per above arguments, consensus at WP:WINNEROUTCOMES (bullet point 4) exists such that players who fall under this criteria are routinely deemed not-notable and thus deleted. GauchoDude (talk) 13:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.