Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yousuf Gabriel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Yousuf Gabriel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: A Google search reveals no notability at all. The article initially read like a fan page and contained some really bizarre assertions. I've cleaned it up, but it still says nothing of importance and is drawn only from the subject's own "official website" -- which the page creator later tried to retitle as "unofficial" (as if that matters; it's still non-neutral) -- as well as some unattributed and subjective text surrounding one book on Google books George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I was unable to find reliable sources independent of the subject or independent of parties conducting a campaign of drawing attention to the subject so as to promote sales of subject authored book. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. -- Paleorthid (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete per nom. The sources are reliable as well as verifiable and in Urdu Language. These sites dedicated to the research on this personality and to promote it's mission of peace in the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjadil (talk • contribs) 12:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually you created this page yourself and did so by filling it full of subjective, fan-like and poorly judged statements with unacceptable sources. You also seem to be promoting the sale of a new book. Why have you put "per nom"? Don't you know what that means?George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 16:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * George Custer&#39;s Sabre Then It should be corrected instead of to be undone. What about other sources that has been removed by your good self? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjadil (talk • contribs) 09:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NAUTHOR: no independent coverage except for a mention in a local newspaper (I mean, a very local paper: an internet magazine proudly called The Times of Sost, which is a Pakistani village of a hundred houses or so). Has recently published a single book, itself failing WP:NBOOK. No slightest indication of significance, either. — kashmiri  TALK  17:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Subject does not passes the WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, and nor WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NBOOK.Justice007 (talk) 10:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Pl. explain the points being violated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjadil (talk • contribs) 08:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.