Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouthDebates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

YouthDebates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This would appear to fail a number of specific notability criteria - WP:ORG, WP:WEB - as well as WP:GNG. Given that that the article was created in 2014, it seems reasonable enough to start a WP:AfD discussion to allow those who might have this watchlisted to contribute, rather than speedy deletion. That Talk:YouthDebates is still a redlink would appear to be both a validation of the need for a deletion discussion, and also an indication of what I expect the outcome to be. My !vote is WP:A7, but let's see what happens. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  21:49, 9 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per A7. Neither the organization's own website nor its Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts confer notability, and out of the two (2) sources which this principle leaves, one is a flattering interview with the founder, and the other reads like a press release. Not what I'd call independent reliable sources. Bishonen &#124; talk 03:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.