Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouthQuake Live


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

YouthQuake Live

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage per WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, as someone who would have possibly A7'd it as it is currently written I could find this from a GSearch; all of the Jacksonville.com sources are dead links but appear to establish notability when viewed through the Internet Archive. (,, and ) Those all three count as one source since they're from the same website, but it, BoldCityVoice, and News4Jax seem to be independent from both YouthQuake and one another. It's not much, but barely notable is still notable. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- This is a poor article, but if it really involves people from 40 churches in multiple denominations, it is probably notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORGSIG, "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable...merely because it exists", "No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is" - fails WP:ORGCRIT as it has not "been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources" - interviews are not reliable sources - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The current version has zero references.  The sources located by John M Wolfson don't impress me as being WP:SIGCOV.  Had I found the article in this state from six years ago, I would have WP:G11'd it.  Since that time, it got cleaned of the promotional stuff, but there's really nothing left.  No objection to somebody starting from scratch in draft space, assuming they can find solid references.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.