Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yowl like a barse

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as obvious hoax. Contains several claims that are verifiably false. Never nominated for any oscars and Christopher Walken never appeared in it. - Mgm|(talk) 13:26, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Yowl like a barse
This film is not included in IMDB's entry for Christopher Walken. It was not nominated for an academy award in 1999 or 2000. Googling and searching IMDB for the name of this film returns nothing. Notability not established; possible hoax. Sliggy 16:56, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * and "Tiff Risco" has been deleted by a previous Vote for Deletion Sliggy 16:58, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * sorry, the above link is for a Tiff Risco "film", this is the link for Tiff Risco himself Sliggy 17:09, August 29, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep - It made me smile anyway. As I have suggested in earler VfDs,  That something is not listed by Google is not sufficient to justify it's deletion.  I rather suspect that using google to justify the deletion of an article is merely being lazy.  (IMNSHO) 212.101.64.4 17:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * True, but why keep an obvious hoax? We're an encyclopedia, not a joke book, after all. -Splash 19:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * strong delete as an obvious hoax. The fake claim of academy award nomination clinches it. Brighterorange 17:04, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Because something doesn't exist is sufficient to justify its deletion. Halo 17:14, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax; is the title meant to come out as "you like up arse" when said quickly, or is that just my dirty mind? --LemonAndLime 17:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * But yeah, it did still make me laugh. "Best sound editing" gag is a good 'un. I vote to delete obscure academy awards. Heh. Sorry. --LemonAndLime 17:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity oops, I mean dumb. --Quasipalm 17:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant hoax.--Scimitar parley 17:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Even if it were funny (it's not), it wouldn't be an appropriate article. Delete. Al 17:51, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN--195.92.168.175 00:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaximus maximus. -Splash 19:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Barsecruft. Gazpacho 20:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, and ask the creator to 'stop adding nonsense' to WP. We've had a run of these 'barse' related articles deleted already, the joke is wearing thin (speedy as vandalism?)--Doc (?) 21:51, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jachin 22:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Delete, just because something is nonsense doesn't give it BJAODN rights. Zoe 07:54, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * I resisted explicitly voting before because I wanted input to ensure this wasn't a film akin to Bad Taste. It clearly isn't, so I've added a speedy delete to the article under WP:CSD General 3, silly/joke article vandalism Sliggy 08:55, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.