Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoxall, Colorado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Yoxall, Colorado

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Likely not notable (WP:NGEO), may be a hoax. Only thing I could find in GNIS was a ditch. https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/55e239de-f2fe-5c77-9723-31b9006d77df/summary wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  07:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  07:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  07:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete it does appear to have been a Union Pacific Statio; however, I cannot truly verify this as the book that appears to have this content, "Official Freight Shippers Guide and Directory of Union Pacific Railroad" is not digitized and not, to the best of my knowledge, available in any form online. In fact, the nearest library to me which has this book is over 500 miles away, having said that, even if it was a train station that is abandoned and is only mentioned in a railroad directory, it is certainly not notable under WP:GEOLAND. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 03:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * delete I found this 1906 gazetteer which also describes it as a "station in Weld County on Union Pacific Railroad". Barring better documentation it appears to fail to meet our standards. Mangoe (talk) 14:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * delete sources do not meet WP:V. - Scarpy (talk) 21:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - All sources point to this being nothing more than a railroad station siding, nowhere close to GNG-level coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 17:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.