Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yrf untitled project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Yrf untitled project

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Crystal Ball. So much of a crystal ball, it doesnt even have a title. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the concerns listed in the nomination and also note the lack of references. With so much crucial data missing, an article on the film is premature at this point. Sjakkalle (Check!)  20:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NOTFILM, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." --DGaw (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Incubate  for 5 or 6 weeks, as the film is completes and slated for release in January 2012. Even without a title (I am guessing this is quite likely kept secret to increase interest in this project), information on this completed film is available,et al and can be spoken of and expanded at Yash Chopra until we do have a title and confirmation of its release so that he article can be brought back out of the incubator and renamed to reflect the then-revealed title.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed mind about incubation. We can always undelete later.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article has no sources, and is about a movie that has yet to be made.  If the movie becomes notable after it is released, a new article could be written with proper sources, but I don't think there's any point in keeping this around untill then, especially since it's got it's fair share of grammar/punctuation issues and not a lot of content. Millermk90 (talk) 08:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTFILM. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.