Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ythos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Ythos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This company exists, but I cannot find sufficent substantial independent RS coverage of it, having checked gnews and gbooks. Created by a one-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Could not find any RS for this article, and I feel as though the article does carry a bit of a non-neutral/promotional tone as well. MyNameWasTaken (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable. Spam. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - as SPA Spam / Promotional as above, unreferenced. Dialectric (talk) 11:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another software and technology company advertising on Wikipedia:
 * Initially the company focused on leading edge consulting contracts with several of the worlds' leading companies.....
 * The company provides technology and business consulting services across the care continuum...
 * The company employs an agile business model for rapid application development projects....
 * The company also operates an international network of expert developers who are commissioned for specific module or service developments thus ensuring that the platform includes an ever increasing portfolio of competences.
 * Typical, deliberately uninformative drivel - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - It could be kept if sources were added from Google news, and a coherent narrative constructed around those, putting the cart before the horse, so to speak. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.