Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ytri Dalur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (closed by non-admin). RMHED (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ytri Dalur

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as per WP:NOTE -- (I have already tagged same article with another name) Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  14:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: Named geographic locations are, by Wikipedia's definition, pretty much always notable. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Quasirandom. This kind of article is basically beyond the scope of AFD, though it needs improvement. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real geographical locations are deemed encyclopedic, per WP:OUTCOMES. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, per everyone although needs cleanup, and also I'm curious that it's just a 'valley' - I'm not sure the same criteria apply to a valley as they would to a village. There are many, many named geographical locations (I'm talking about things that are not human settlements) that have names (like on Ordnance Survey maps, there are many, many names), and they can't all be notable.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.