Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuanfan Yang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Yuanfan Yang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Most likely COI: major contributors User:Jing1271 and User:Jingwang1271 have contributed to this article only. For years, all the content was copied from the artist's website, which I have now removed.

The only significant coverage I've found is this article on Newsweek. There are several more mentions in passing, mostly related to competitions. Per WP:MUSICBIO though, he has not won a major competition. intforce (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. intforce (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. intforce (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. intforce (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: I have added some of the subject's competitive appearances and a bylined review of his album. As the subject is an early career musician, still appearing in competitions (e.g. the delayed XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition ), regrettably in this field of endeavour his awards seem to fall short of WP:MUSICBIO criterion 9. I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON to demonstrate notability by WP:MUSICBIO criteria 8 or 9. AllyD (talk) 07:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 09:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.