Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuen Wai-hung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Yuen Wai-hung

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Feng shui proponent, notability not established, contested prod. Only one obscure reference, other than self-published sources. WWGB (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Provisional Delete Can't find any notable references by Googling for "Yuen Wai-hung" or "Wai-hung Yuen". I guess there might be Chinese language sources out there somewhere - are there any Chinese speakers who can check? -- Boing!   said Zebedee  12:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There are two non-self publishing sources Face magazine (FACE 周刊) and (忽然1周). This is not an issue of source.  Two to three sources from one editor on first edit is actually pretty good.  I can find you 50 articles with no references at all.  Secondly these types of subjects are generally not online.  It is about 100% unsearchable in english.  You are wasting your time. This person is notable in the east. Benjwong (talk) 01:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: clearly fails test for coverage. Google results for FACE周刊 "袁偉雄" has 3 hits - 2 from personal homepage, and the last the article being considered for deletion.  Search for 忽然1周 "袁偉雄" has one hit - this AfD itself. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: Most of this type of topics are not online. I cannot emphasize that enough. Benjwong (talk) 02:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * And notability requires independent referencing. I cannot emphasize that enough. All we have so far is a self-published website and one magazine article. WWGB (talk) 02:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. References don't have to be online - if you have offline references (eg to reliable printed material) you can use those - but the key point is that there must be reliable references of some sort. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  08:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.