Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuga Shahstra Yojana Par Bhanu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Yuga Shahstra Yojana Par Bhanu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Hanuman Chalisa already exists and the calculation doesn't have any scientific basis.  Harshil want to talk? 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  Harshil want to talk? 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  Harshil want to talk? 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  Harshil want to talk? 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Harshil want to talk? 08:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Hanuman Chalisa. While the article by itself seems to cross WP:GNG, I see no reason why it warrants a separate article for the time being. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No, the topic does not "cross WP:GNG". The article says "has been claimed by the Hindus..." Claimed by what Hindus? A small fringe group of them. The article is sourced to unreliable sources which promulgate a claim made in various unreliable sources. No evidence is provided that the existence of this claim has received substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the people making the claim, nor have I found any. JBW (talk) 15:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color: black;">Night</b><b style="color: black">fury</b> 11:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.