Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yugen (restaurant) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Yugen (restaurant)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I previously nominated this article for deletion here, and the nomination was closed as a "soft delete". The page creator proceeded to request its undeletion, and two days later they haven't edited it at all. I'll repeat my reasons for nominating it for deletion in the first place: "Non-notable restaurant whose sources are quite local (meaning they fail WP:AUD). All are written promotionally, as is the article. There's no evidence that this is notable in the long run or at the present time. The sources lack WP:SIGCOV, and they mostly focus on the food and the interior of the restaurant." The article itself is in bad condition, composed mostly of a promotional description; even if it were "improved", I don't think there's a lot to add. In addition, the restaurant opened relatively recently, near the end of 2018, so there's no historical value there. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and Australia.  Nythar  (💬-🍀) 11:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my previous !vote. Mainly local reviews. The Sydney Morning Herald may be more reliable but it's actually by a journalist based with the Age in Melbourne. LibStar (talk) 14:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Right now this is just an article cited to WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS of a local restaurant. Fails WP:NOTTRAVEL on its face and WP:NCORP as well. Restaurants can be notable, but they need more than just local reviews. SportingFlyer  T · C  14:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be mostly WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS and I could not find information to pass GNG. Grahaml35 (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete For the reasons outlined by the nom. It is against the spirit of a restore request to get an article restored and then not bother to work on it. Especially in light of the editor's TBAN on AFD. I've also nominated Francoforte for the same reasons.  HighKing++ 16:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.