Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuima Nakazato (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The article does need a rewrite, but there doesn't seem to be consensus that it is bad enough to warrant WP:TNT or re-draftification. The additional sources provided by seem to be enough to answer the GNG concerns. The Wordsmith Talk to me 19:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Yuima Nakazato
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article was moved to draft as a result of the previous AfD (that I started), still, the references do not show that this article meets WP:NPERSON or WP:GNG most are just trivial mentions of the subject, most are not that reliable or such. Seawolf35 T--C 18:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: As this was only recently moved from draft-space, do not want to close as soft delete. Relisting. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Seawolf35 T--C 18:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep – Whilst a few of the sources are trivial, I believe that several of them are in-depth. Alternatively, I recommend to draftify so the information can be preserved and article can be improved. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: I voted keep last time, with about four sources in my last comment. Same applies here I suppose. Oaktree b (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or re-drafitify. Sorry, but immediately moving a page back to mainspace, and then adding one ref (where the subject isn't even mentioned) is just not good enough.-KH-1 (talk) 04:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article definitely needs improving but the subject is clearly notable. I'm a bit tired of editors suggesting moving clearly notable articles to drafts rather than helping to improve them. This article also has coverage from NHK which I quickly found - a full 50 minutes on the national TV network in 2011. That's in addition to coverage of a major award in the Japan Times all the way back in 2007 . It appears there's offline coverage from the Kyoto Costume Institute's very reputable journal. Features in collections at the Mori Art Museum and MoMu Antwerp. There's almost certainly more (I searched for about 5 mins) but it quite obviously is far beyond the minimum threshold of the general notability guideline. If editors feel that the article as it stands is not worth keeping, I would not be opposed to reducing it to a few lines and providing these sources as notability for future expansion (which I may even be interested in) DCsansei (talk) 16:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * In addition to what I have listed above, his latest collection at the Paris Fashion Show has significant coverage from Wired, SCMP , Dscene , among others. Coverage in NorieM (could be viewed as commercial since they do both magazine and sell, but I think relatively reliable in fashion) and a feature in the national newspaper, Asahi Shinbun . DCsansei (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.