Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Tokumitsu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Yuka Tokumitsu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced BLP. Laun chba  ller  21:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Short career, minimal major roles. Appears to be non-notable. --erachima talk 13:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable roles as Gatomon (テイルモン Teirumon?, Tailmon) in the Digimon films. Also in Yume no Crayon Oukoku - The Crayon Kingdom of Dreams, did the voice of Princess Silver, the main character.  Passes the subject specific guideline for voice actors at WP:ENT.   D r e a m Focus  21:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Still requires sources to demonstrate this.SephyTheThird (talk) 20:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. Just whatever random people show up at these things, determine whether articles that are basically the same are kept or deleted.  ENT #1 is clearly met.  Primary sources are fine to prove the person was in the films with the parts they are said to have.   D r e a m Focus  18:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to say about this person, and given their apparent retirement, there will continue to be nothing to say about this person for the foreseeable future. That is the essence of non-notability. Feel free to prove me wrong if you can find the sources. --erachima talk 18:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not some magical card you can wave to justify all voice actor articles. Primary sources can be used to say something, they do not make a person notable, WP:Basic tells us this. WP:ENT does not make an article or subject immune from the same fundamental requirements we make of other articles. In the case of this particular individual, the amount of roles attributed it so small that it's debatable if they really qualify as a voice actor rather than someone who just happened to have done a couple of roles part time (not uncommon). Theres nothing here to suggest that any meaningful coverage is likely to exist, and coverage is more important than continually misunderstanding notability guidelines. In fact, it being an unsourced article about as living person is enough reason to delete it, regardless of anything else.SephyTheThird (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nomination. AlanS (talk) 12:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Given the total absence of any sourcing or in-depth third-party coverage regarding roles or appearances, it's difficult to see how notability has been established. --DAJF (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * delete no sources provided to verify roles that may establish notability. LibStar (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.