Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuki Damon(Internet Celebrity)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete. Jeremy (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Yuki Damon(Internet Celebrity)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Obvious autobiography, full of hoaxes including being the distant cousin of Matt Damon. Fails WP:BIO. Tbh®tch Talk © Happy New Year 00:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N, WP:V. Even the "internet celebrity" label is doubtful given the rather pitiful youtube view counts.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above (WP:BIO, WP:N, WP:V). --みんな空の下 (トーク &#124; I wanna chAngE!) 01:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as above and I think a good case can be made for Speedy Delete as spam. Clearly promotional in nature. Safiel (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Has valid cause to stay, because it shows information on a person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.68.122 (talk) 03:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not the criteria here. Our criteria is whether WP:BIO is satisfied. Merely showing "information on a person" is an awfully low bar for notability. By that logic "Joe is an awesome guy" would qualify as an article. Zachlipton (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Straight up Autobiography that is clearly promotional in nature. Not backed by reliable sources. Zachlipton (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Sumsum2010 · T · C  05:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable autobiography. BTW, where are the categories for this discussion?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 08:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, Autobio. I would have considered it as Speedy Delete for obvious self-serving spam, if not for the AfD. -- Alexf(talk) 19:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a medium for self-promotion. In fact I think speedy delete would not be unreasonable.JamesBWatson (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone above, and Speedy Delete could also be considered. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI: there appears to be a copy of the article at Yuki damon. Rjwilmsi  17:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom (and the copy at Yuki damon also, which I have now tagged to have the same fate as the article nominated here). bd2412  T 18:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If I had caught this as a new article I would probably have put a CSD on it. I don't think it's a hoax but it's clearly an attempt at self-promotion of and by a very unnotable subject.--Kudpung (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't nominate it for CSD because it is obvious that some people believe he is notable, and those people recreate those article many time with many names, as a recent example is Yuki damon. Tbhotch ™ © Happy New Year 05:02, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.