Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukio Ishizuka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Yukio Ishizuka

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article has serious issues regarding the promotional tone and the appropriateness of the content in general. I was just going to revise it significantly until realising that, as far as I can tell, essentially all sources are inappropriate- they're either primary references or from a source that I cannot reasonably verify because they have no existence online. On this basis I don't believe this individual meets notability guidelines Cipactli8 (talk) 00:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Psychiatry, Japan, Massachusetts, New York,  and South Carolina.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. This article is a promotional piece full of dubious sources, primary sources, original research, and unverified sentences disguised as citations. The user who created it, PositiveMentalHealth, has also does nothing but work on this article and the one on Lifetrack Therapy, which has the same issues. Cortador (talk) 08:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: A number of namedrops, a number of primary sources, a heap of obfuscatory refbombing, heavily promotional tone, no evidence the subject actually meets the GNG.   Ravenswing     12:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Promotional. Both Lifetrack Therapy and Yukio Ishizuka were created by User:PositiveMentalHealth, the only articles created by the user. — Maile  (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious attempt at refbombing. The article didn't show any notability, the article mostly showcased his approaches which have quite clear promotional tone. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   19:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.