Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Nova (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Yulia Nova
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline; zero GNews hits, zero nontrivial GBooks hits. Survived initial AFD in 2007 based on relaxed PORNBIO criteria no longer recognized as valid. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Didn't even pass PORNBIO in 2007. Epbr123 (talk) 23:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Notable mainly in a non-English-speaking country, therefore does not meet criteria set up by Wikipedia's biased editors. Dekkappai (talk) 00:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:PORNBIO is notoriously biased, and has been shown so numerous times, since it is only relevant to English-language North American porn stars. Applying it to non-English-language porn fails. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  —76.66.192.55 (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  —76.66.192.55 (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Find Sources template doesn't seem to work in Japanese... 76.66.192.55 (talk) 07:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.