Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulia Pochynok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Yulia Pochynok

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recently minted phd who does not seem to meet WP:PROF. That said, some of the sources are in Ukranian, so if there are sources I don't understand that do demonstrate notability, please post below. agt x 19:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The sources in the article that you don't understand are actually in Polish, not Ukrainian, and are announcements of lectures by Pochynok and articles written by her - nothing that demonstrates notability. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. At least two are in Cyrillic  so I figure they're not in Polish.  agt x  04:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * So they are. I didn't notice them before because the article gives them English titles. They are a blog post and an interview with the subject on a radio station serving Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. Still nothing to demonstrate notability. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything that indicates WP:PROF notability or WP:GNG for that matter; is essentially a CV. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources either in the article or by searching for the Ukrainian, Polish and English spellings of the name. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, added women project to article talkpage so particpants are notified of afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly a worthy person but there are no sources to support notability WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO at the moment, but has potential for WP-notability in the future. This is a good example of an article that has been created too early. WP inclusion is about notability, not potential for future notability, however strong that potential may appear to be.--Eric Yurken (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete; has a lot of publication credits, but probably TOOSOON.  Montanabw (talk) 04:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.