Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Miraboi Mark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Yung Miraboi Mark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This "brand manager and motivational speaker" seems to be lacking in notability. The main coverage is based on gossip about a minor dust-up with the police, the rest is even more incidental. Being nominated (unsuccessfully) for two minor awards does not notability make, either. Insufficient coverage, does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 17:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep :- If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. That its the meaning of WP:GNG which the subject has received significant coverage from different reliable source such as newspapers and also independent of its subject. The word “Brand manager and motivational speaker” was confirms from the newspapers which are strongly reliable and to proof his notability, for the recommended source to know him in such profession it proof his notable. People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published. Regarding your quoted section in WP:NBIO kindly read Basic Criteria. I found nothing wrong in the awards being nominated, people can be notable with nominations of awards but haven’t won any that doesn’t mean they aren’t suitable to be on Wikipedia. According to my research I see the awards which was being nominated are notable in their region which have been won by other public figure who are also notable and are on Wikipedia. --Kuki764 (talk) 04:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete there are at most two RS here. The nomination is accurate. The breadth of sources that one would expect is not there and not found in a search.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple reliable sources (more than one) exist, so GNG is (barely) satisfied. EnPassant (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * They have to be sigcov sources. Could you say more, beyond the pasted text that you have used in many other AFDs where I had just voted?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 13:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete also the image, how it comes that it is identical with the one in the vanguard article? -- Oisguad (talk) 08:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, saw the image on vanguard newspaper but that it’s supposed to be handled by the Wikipedia commons but the main topic here should the article be deleted or keep and your reasons --Kuki764 (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I still suggest the article should be keep because I just found a news from another reliable source which is The Independent news, A Nigerian newspaper which also passes WP:GNG --Kuki764 (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Is Nutin 19:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soltesh (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Subject matter fails general notability guidelines per WP:PERSON. Please Kuki764 you seem to have some sort of conflict of interest with the said subject, kindly state your connection with him. Even if we would consider the article for any reason, it has no encyclopedic value as it also fails the basic WP:N It doesn’t meet the primary notability criterion of “Significant Coverage”, by virtue of that I would suggest you consider WP:TOOSOON.
 * Delete this is way too soon. We know that his motivation comes from women and that he had some problems with police from sources that look far from being reliable. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.