Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Trace of 1410


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Yung Trace of 1410

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. No credible, secondary sources besides Twitter and Soundcloud. --   LuK3      (Talk)   19:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

As I made the page can I have a few days to find and add sources to the article?--TaylorSwift2000 (talk) 03:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * hi, afds usually last for 7 days to give editors time to look for sources/improve an article. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as a non-notable person per the nomination. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. -- Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up non-useable sources such as facebook, youtube, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON? Coolabahapple (talk) 07:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.