Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuni Wa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Yuni Wa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was a previous A7, but now reappeared from an WP:SPA who "dropped" this BLP in one go on their 2nd edit to Wikipedia (e.g. WP:SPI and/or WP:UPE issues here). Lots of Instagram/youtube/blogs on this subject, but nothing in the main music RS like Rolling Stone; zero SIGCOV. Instead of going A7 (again), I decided to bring to the AfD community. Britishfinance (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Britishfinance (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * This page should not be deleted. The artist that it’s about has 11.5 million listens globally and is a legitimate globally known artist. All links show proof that they are an active artist and have been releasing music for years with songs that have as much as 100,000 views to over 1 million views. They are housed under one of biggest distribution companies in the country (Symphonic Distribution) and everything on all grounds is confirmable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princetoncole (talk • contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * You need to explain to your client that existence is not sufficient to be notable on Wikipedia. Wikipedia's criteria for notability does not include "youtube hits", as they are misleading (and potentially made-up), statistics; hence why your client needs Wikipedia to improve their actual notability. Britishfinance (talk) 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Explain to my client? I’m sorry I’am Princeton Coleman aka yuni wa. Here is a major problem you are not understand. The definition of no·ta·bil·i·ty is the fact or quality of being notable or being known. You are calling my very real YouTube statistics fake and you are ignoring that I’ve been featured on one of the biggest music media companies to date (Elevator Mag) I’ve been nominated for best electronic producer/Dj by the Arkansas times. Named one of the top visionary Arkansans for the year of 2017 by the Arkansas times. I was literally even on the vice website for production credits that I have with someone that is signed to mass appeal records. Who are you and why are you out right disregarding the proof that is right there. The fact you are saying I have “YouTube hits” and fake statistics is extremely disrespectful and you are mishandling your job greatly and you are treating this situation poorly. Notability is being well known, you are disregarding the well known songs I have on YouTube, SoundCloud, and Spotify. Actually since you think my YouTube stats are fake you know I’m doing 42k monthly on Spotify right? If you keep disregarding the information I will simply go out my way to inquire further and possibly see to it that you lose your job doing this because this is disrespectful to everything I’ve worked for specially since I actually do meet the notability requirements. You need to do your research. Also I never said my existence was sufficient for a page I’m literally a well known music producer and you are ignorant to that. Read the references, look at my history online as a Music producer. None of this is made up.user talk • contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princetoncole (talk • contribs)
 * "If you keep disregarding the information I will simply go out my way to inquire further and possibly see to it that you lose your job doing this" is a WP:THREAT and should be withdrawn. Narky Blert (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * You have a prodigious talent for Wikipedia producing an article of that quality on your 2nd edit; if the music business does not work out, you have a future here, although creating your own BLP is a WP:COI. However, if your story about being the author is not true, then we are probably in WP:SPI and WP:UPE territory (concepts you are probably familiar with from other accounts). In any event, we shall let the community decide the outcome. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 13:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 17:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The above discussion has revealed that the article was created by the musician himself, and while conflict of interest is certainly relevant, the gentleman simply does not understand that Wikipedia is not a promotional service but instead provides information on people, things, and events that have become items of general knowledge. This requires evidence of significant media coverage in reliable sources, and quantities of YouTube views and Instagram shares won't cut it. The musician has self-released a lot music that has been largely ignored by the media and has produced some other people who are themselves non-notable. Sorry, but come back after you get noticed by reliable critics and people outside of your own social media. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 22:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absent very good coverage about the person, articles about record producers are almost always deleted, because they are plainly run of the mill. Any person over the age of seven can post a video on the Internet or spin a record, and get millions of followers. We could excuse noobies in 2009, but not in 2019; everyone has known for years that Wikipedia is not for self-promotion and that as a charity governed by New York laws, we and Letitia James enforce notability standards and punish self-dealing. Bearian (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.