Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri Botnari conductor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Yuri Botnari conductor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It would appear to me the assertions made in this article simply do not correspond to what can be be verified. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * First of all is the assertion that the subject is an "internationally renowned conductor". If that was the case, it would be expected that there would be an internet footprint for this conductor in reliable sources about classical music. As can be seen (Find sources:... ) at the top of this nomination, there appears to be nothing of that sort.
 * The assertions that the subject of this article has been involved with orchestras and organizations with blue links in the current form of the article similarly are without verification.
 * The red linked orchestras and organizations - Barcelona Philharmonic Orchestra, British Musician Union - are also of concern. Perhaps they have yet Wikipedia articles?
 * As for "www.royalmusicsociety.us", it would appear that, most kindly put, it a platform for new musicians to put forward their works. I do not think it is an appropriate external link, let alone a reference for a living person.
 * Delete and salt. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. Already salted at Yuri Botnari. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and saltmultiple A7 G11 per user and this doesn't seems better and can we snow close this fast?Quek157 (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, whereas the subject might be notable, the currebnt article has been written by a bunch of COI editors, and I do not see how it can be brought to our standards without being deleted first. If someone wants to recreate the article, it must be an independent user, who will perform a careful analysis of sources, establishing their reliability and independence.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.