Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri andrade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Yuri andrade

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This would appear to fail WP:BLP1E. Wikipedia is not news, and this man is "a low-profile individual" who received coverage "only in the context of a single event." Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BLPCRIME, WP:BLP1E, and any other notability measure. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this meets any speedy deletion criteria. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 05:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Super Bowl LV: Clearly 1E but likely a term to be highly searched. The streaker is briefly mentioned in that part of the article. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 04:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Given that this appears to have been some sort of publicity stunt, I don't think we should even leave a redirect behind. The last thing anyone should want is to see desperate attempts for attention like this one "succeeding," on any level. Better to remove all trace of it from Wikipedia entirely. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Not our judgement, imo. For whatever reason it was done, there are reliable sources that discuss it. As I believe you said in a previous deletion discussion, redirects are cheap. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 06:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. As per above fails WP:GNG, WP:BLPCRIME and more. Setreis (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep he got major coverage in the news. All the major media have written about him, so he meets Wikipedia guidelines for having significant coverage. Jaxarnolds (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:BLP1E. SK2242 (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I am updating my vote to REDIRECT and have added a section here Super_Bowl_LV.New vote will be below.Jaxarnolds (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Only known for an event that lasted a few seconds. Keeping the name would serve no encyclopedic purpose, and there is a criminal case issue.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per GNG, BLP1e, BLP-CRIME. Momentary fame of this sort is not the same as notability, it's marketing. Non-encyclopedic event.   GenQuest  "scribble" 12:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This content belongs in the main Super Bowl LV article, not as an article on its own. Threedotshk (talk) 12:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP1E. SK2242 (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is he not important, his purpose was to get attention for reckless and irresponsible behavior which having the metaphorical historical plaque of a Wikipedia page would only further incentivize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackson Hamilton (talk • contribs) 14:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as stated for all reasons above, clearly just a one-time notability event that can exist just fine within the confines of the main article. GNG fails for the individual. - SanAnMan (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Follow-up note, I think a WP:SNOW close may be in order here. There's no chance of this going any further. My two cents. - SanAnMan (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * A snow close isn't appropriate given the possibilities of redirecting or merging (especially given that the last two !votes are not to delete). Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and if you need a reason, Ignore all rules. Deleting this article will make Wikipedia better.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG for the individual - anything about the moment can be expressed in main Super Bowl article. Redoryxx (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge Could earn a brief mention in the Super Bowl article, not much otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect Redirect to Super_Bowl_LV, a new section I added.Jaxarnolds (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing is worth merging/redirecting. Clear WP:BIO1E.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect Redirect to Super_Bowl_LV. Notoriety for a single event, clear WP:SINGLEEVENT. Field invasion is not a notorious event for an encyclopedia. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not redirect - per WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. I do not think a redirect should exist per the BLP guidelines (especially since this person's name does not even appear at Super Bowl LV and the relevant section has since been removed from that article). Eagles 24/7 (C)  20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 08:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7  (C)  20:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.