Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuriko Ono


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Yuriko Ono

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't come close to meeting WP:NACTOR. Current sourcing does not have the type of in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to show notability, and searches did not turn up enough either.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - In addition to the articles cited on the page already, there are many other reliable sources available through simple searches. Just focusing on RS of significant depth and length, here are a few:, , , , , etc. Passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 05:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Michitaro's sources need to be addressed
 * Delete As per Onel5969  Brookie :)  { - like the mist - there  one moment and then gone!}  (Whisper...) 17:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no question that the subject fails WP:NACTOR.  Dr Strauss   talk  13:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to pass WP:GNG per the sources provided. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 09:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.