Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusaku Maezawa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 06:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Yusaku Maezawa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1140th richest person, mere 25th richest in Japan, and founder of an unlinked "business" does not give significant enough notability for a Wikipedia article ES  &#38;L  11:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete. Agree with the nominator. No in-depth coverage or third-party sourcing to demonstrate adequate notability. --DAJF (talk) 04:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources (for example Forbes). Billionaires are usually notable. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment What's the reason for the scare quotes around business in the nom? --Cckerberos (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. While he seems to be somewhat controversial, he has been subject to considerable coverage in the major Japanese press, especially the business press:, , , , , , , , , , , , , etc. Coverage in the English language press also exists: , , , etc. Easily passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep There are certainly enough sources, which is not surprising for 25th richest in Japan, which is quite an accomplisment. &#39;DGG (at NYPL)&#39; (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.