Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YuuWaa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

YuuWaa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be an advertisement and has had said flag since 2012; service is no longer available (suspended indefinitely), and does not appear to be notable. - akoimeexx &laquo;talk&raquo; 18:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;Appears to be significant coverage in The Inquirer, Engadget, PC Advisor and geek.com. Despite the service being halted, I think the historical coverage meets WP:NSOFT.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The nomination doesn't contain any valid reason to delete. The fact that the article is written like an advertorial is not a reason to delete - it's a reason to rewrite it. The fact that the service/company no longer operates/exists is irrelevant, WP has thousands of articles about things, places, people, orgs, etc. that no longer exist. The cited sources are sufficient to pass GNG. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Changing to Delete per Carrite and Kudpung - the RS media coverage is not sufficient to pass the Notability gate. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I just don't see the set of product reviews offered by Lesser Cartographies above as being sufficient to meet GNG. I am seeing notices that YuuWaa is no more but not a lot counting towards GNG in a quick spin around the internets. I suspect that deletion for failing to meet GNG, not being the subject of multiple, substantial, independently published pieces of coverage about the topic, would be appropriate. Carrite (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the majority of the links supplied as references are routine product  reviews while several  others are dead sites already. No, this does not  meet  GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.